Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2007 December
2007 October
2007 September
2007 August
2007 June
2007 May
2007 April
2007 March
2007 February
2007 January
2006 December
2006 November
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 July
2006 June
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
|
| i couldn't have said it any better--straight from the governor's mouth |
| 01.07.07 (1:04 pm) [edit] |
Taxpayers benefit when government contracts with private businesses
by Governor Mitch Daniels (as printed in the Northwest Times of Indiana, January 2, 2007)
This week, after two years of study, competition and negotiation, I signed a contract to reform Indiana's welfare system. Although this proposal has been under constant attack for weeks, it is one of the most straightforward and obvious decisions our administration has faced. Here's why.
Today's welfare system, as run by the monstrous bureaucracy known as the Family and Social Service Administration, is totally indefensible.
Its clients know it: In surveys more than two-thirds of them condemn its customer service as poor.
The federal government knows it: Because of chronic high error rates and the worst welfare to work record in America, Indiana is facing the loss of millions of federal dollars in penalties if the system is not fixed soon.
Indiana prosecutors know it: Over the last few years, they have brought dozens of cases against welfare workers who were defrauding the public through various scams or outright theft.
The only folks who may not have known how miserably the system is performing are Hoosier taxpayers, but many of them have suspected the truth.
For Hoosier taxpayers, reform means enormous savings: a half billion dollars over the next 10 years, and that's only on the administrative side. When today's high rates of errors and fraud are brought down, savings will probably exceed a billion dollars.
For those who actually do deserve food stamps, Medicaid, or welfare assistance, this change means far better service, with many additional phone and Internet options. No longer will they have to contact the system only at places and times convenient to the bureaucracy, then wait a month or longer for an answer or a decision.
For employees of the system, their new private sector employment with IBM or one of its partners means equal or better pay, benefits, pensions and career prospects superior to any state government can offer them. It also means they will be freed of pushing paper and able to spend more of their time helping citizens achieve self-sufficiency.
And for the Indiana economy, the bargain we struck with IBM commits the company to bring an additional 1,000 quality jobs to our state. Without any question, this change is squarely in the public interest; leaving the system as it is would have been not just wrong but immoral.
Since the status quo lobby cannot really defend the mess they created, they resort to broadside attacks on "privatization." Again, taxpayers beware.
There is absolutely nothing new about government delivering a service by contracting rather than hiring more people on government payrolls. That's how we build highways, train employees, service computers, and purchase plane tickets, for example.
Almost all of Medicaid is already "privatized": The doctors, substance abuse counselors and hospitals are not government-owned, they are private businesses. The billing and back office functions are all under private contract, exactly as welfare's now will be. Overall, more than nine out of 10 FSSA dollars are already spent through contracts with the private sector.
We contract for service for only one reason, to get a better deal for the taxpayer. We saved $12 million a year when we "privatized" the cooking of prison food, millions more by hiring private janitorial services and collection agencies to pursue tax evaders. We "privatize" functions to save tax dollars, but each time we do there is a secondary benefit: The Indiana private economy gets a little stronger.
The private sector that some interest groups and politicians love to bash is where most Hoosiers work, and thank goodness. That's where the money to fund government comes from; without a strong private sector, there are no taxes for government to spend in the first place.
I wince when I hear Indiana politicians bad-mouth the private sector, using words like "profit" and "private" as though they were cuss words. Every day, we are talking to companies around the nation and the world about in-sourcing new jobs to Indiana. All of them have other options, and few will take their dollars to a place where business is the target of contempt and abuse.
Indiana deserves a government run for the benefit of the taxpayer and not special interests. When you consider the source, the howls you've been hearing only underscore the extent to which our upcoming welfare reforms put taxpayers first.
|
|
|
| |
posted by: reply)
post date: 03.03.08 (12:31 am)
Great boys
6eebe698b55069fddd760324bf47356b
posted by: reply)
post date: 03.10.08 (1:47 pm)
Hi boys!
15ab45a99961df4efa6a7752c0c3d6b7
|
Read these:
gentlemen:
bander
Big George
bob
buddy
byrne
covele
dave
edmonson
esau
farmer
grandstaff
greve
hachfeld
halfcent
jj
keacher
keifer
kelley
kennedy
kober
kowski
lockhart
nate
rodrigayz
rodzik
schue box
smalls
scott
swimmah
teeroy
thiede
toasty
tomsu
vince
voda
whit
wojo
girlies:
anna
brie
brooke
cat
danna
droste
jenn Guerard
jenny
j-sco
k 2 the aren
raerae
|
