|
|
 Blog For Free! Archives Home 2007 December 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2006 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2005 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2004 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog 
|
posted by: ScubaDiva (reply) post date: 04.28.04 (9:31 am) I've been a self-proclaimed grammar and spelling princess for years... Recently I corrected folks on A LOT vs. alot. Then there was the famous posting of "damnit" is not a word, and discussed the differences between Dammit! and Damn it. posted by: mblog (reply) post date: 04.28.04 (10:15 am) I took the test and it told me I was a grammar god. But I cheated. I gave the answers I thought it expected me to give. I tried to go back and change things, but it would not let me. It has an "anti cheat" tag in the code. I agree with the answers on about 80% of the questions. But on some of them, the author is being overly pedantic or just plain wrong. For example, one of the questions had to do with a "split infinitive." This bit of nonsense was introduced into grammar books a while ago, but has been discredited for at least half a century as arbitrary nonsense. It's true that Latin does not have split infinitives but that's because it does not have infinitives with two words. The idea to make English conform to Latin in that sense was arbitrary and was not based on established usage. Either Chris' or Chris's is acceptable usage. A published author should be consistent with his publisher's style guide, but having a general answer makes little sense. It's arbitrary. The question about punctuation and quotes had more to do with what country you live in than what is correct. Many grammarians consider the distinction between "which" and "that" to be arbitrary in many contexts. I'd have to give it to the author in this case, because it's awkward to use "which" in that statement without two commas. But it's less obvious in other cases. Considering "everybody" as singular is not always correct or consistent with modern usage. Furthermore, it's not always consistent with historical usage. If you go back to Shakespeare's time, you will find that this modern insistence on it being singular was not there. It also leads to very awkward statements when you insist it be singular and that subject and verb agree and cannot change in mid sentence. For example, "Everybody came to class today and he ate his lunch" seems more than a little twisted. It also introduces ambiguity. If I say that everybody was satisfied with his grade, it could mean that one student got a good grade, and all students were happy about it. It's far more useful to worry about establishing the antecedent than about which pronoun to use. Finally, some sentences that (or which :-) ) are grammatically correct are awkward. I'd rather say "I'm smarter than she is" than the equally correct "I'm smarter than she" or the common error "I'm smarter than her." If somebody knocks on my door, "I won't say "It is I." I'll say "It's mblog." I do tend to agree with his usage of the subjunctive, but in all fairness, many people do not distinguish between the subjunctive and the indicative these days, and many grammarians acknowledge that this distinction is dying out and do not object to the "misuse" of the indicative. But I think it makes sense in #18 to use the subjunctive. The problem with the subjunctive is that if I be overly pedantic, people will think I am using the wrong verb form. posted by: kennyrhit (reply) post date: 04.28.04 (11:01 am) mblog, I agree with you. In a linguistics class I had we learned about the Latin fetish that people had centuries ago to make English more like the 'perfect' language. Also, in class, we came to the conclusion that one's style of grammar should reflect the community in which one is speaking. Obviously, using proper English will seen pretensious around less the educated; and using poor grammar around business executives will sound ignorant. Many of the rules we think are proper English are not-they are completely arbitrary. i.e. using prepositions at the end of sentences. Thanks for enlightening others with your knowledge. I suggest reading the book "The Language Instinct" by Steven Pinker. He has many informational side notes that make the book more interesting that a normal English book. It does get dry for a few chapters, which you may want to skip. (go ahead!) |
 Read these:gentlemen: bander Big George bob buddy byrne covele dave edmonson esau farmer grandstaff greve hachfeld halfcent jj keacher keifer kelley kennedy kober kowski lockhart nate rodrigayz rodzik schue box smalls scott swimmah teeroy thiede toasty tomsu vince voda whit wojo girlies: anna brie brooke cat danna droste jenn Guerard jenny j-sco k 2 the aren raerae |
